improveeducation » whole word

THE EDUCATION ENIGMA–What Happened to American Education

Bruce Price — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:13:22 +0000

Lots of people, lots of money, lots of promises…but public schools don’t seem to be do a very good job. Why not?

That’s THE EDUCATION ENIGMA.

I have 120+ articles on the net. I took my favorite excerpts and created a powerful little book that is now available on Amazon. It covers a lot of ground and a lot of topics, but the conclusion is that our Educational Establishment is drunk on collectivist theory, and therefore lets bad ideas into the schools.

Want better schools? Get rid of the bad methods, such as Whole Word, Reform Math, Constructivism, No Memorization, Cooperative Learning, and many more.

Here’s a link for more information: www.improve-education.org/id61.html

Hostile to Math & Reading

Bruce Price — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:53:23 +0000

Wow! When you really look, our elite educators have been busy-busy-busy. At first glance, you think these people are clumsy, or misguided, or they have very bad judgment. Then you start to see patterns — for example, everything they’re really excited about is usually a bad idea. So bad it takes a kind of genius to concoct it!

In reading, they fell in love with Look-Say, Whole Word, Sight Words, Dolch Words. Call them what you will, they are a lousy way to learn to read. Then, in math, they’ve had a long romance with New Math, New New Math, and Reform Math. The commercial names are TERC, Everyday Math, Connected Math, MathLand, etc. Again, all these things are the worst way to teach math.

See what I mean by patterns? If a bad idea is available, they will find it, take it home, marry it, and make offspring we would rather not deal with. Ah well, you see that I can wax rhapsodic about these people. I am endlessly fascinated by all their craziness. With regard to reading, I’ve just added a comparison chart — see “37: Whole Word versus Phonics — to my site Improve-Education.org. I tried to boil the whole debate down to the essentials. If you’re still confused about why Whole Word doesn’t work, you will find this a useful read. As for math, I added “36: The Assault on Math” to the site. This is a short, sharp critique of what might best be called Anti-Math. Join my crusade.

Why The Public Schools Are A Mess

Bruce Price — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:12:52 +0000

I spend a lot of time trying to solve one of the most interesting crime stories there is.
Why, despite vast sums of money and massive concern by the public, are our educators somehow able to achieve new depths of dumb?
Why?? Because they know what they want and they work at it!
I just put a piece on the web titled “Educators Best Understood as Ignorance Engineers.” It’s not easy these days coming up with an original phrase. But Ignorance Engineers actually seems to be new. And it exactly captures the essence of what I’m more and more confident in saying: these educators are not wayward little waifs lost in the big city; they are cold-hearted ideologues trying to achieve John Dewey’s collectivist dream.
The reason they get away with so much mischief is that people give them the benefit of the doubt: they’re trying; they’re confused; they mean well. Actually, they don’t.
(Please Google: “Educators Best Understood as Ignorance Engineers.“)

Whole Word Wholly Wrong

Bruce Price — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:53:38 +0000

If you are interested in the reading wars, please see a review I just put on Amazon.com for Frank Smith’s “Understanding Reading,” one of the most influential books of the last 50 years.

To this day, I never meet anyone who understands what the reading wars are all about. The Whole Word people keep the debate so murky and sophistical, you’re lucky if you escape with your sanity (or your wallet or your children).

In this Amazon review, I came up with a simple way to clarify Whole Word’s nuttiness.

Stop and think about how difficult it is to memorize numbers. Phone numbers, for example. How many could you retain if your life depended on it? Even 100?

Point is, recalling “Whole Numbers” shows you the difficulty of memorizing “Whole Words.” That’s what Whole Word does—it reduces learning to read to memorizing thousands of number-like designs. For the new reader, English looks like this: sjfgjp tsbfg hthwl xnsk hwhty. For all practical purposes, it also looks like this: 38685 352661 375707 26646 464 8278 664.

For the brain, this is very hard work. And guess what. The same bad thing happens in all cases: REVERSALS. 4581 or 4518? xnsk or xnks? All options look reasonable. Such reversals are quite normal when we struggle to recall a number. But when kids can’t get the letters straight it’s called dysfunction, it’s called dyslexia!

Seems to me, an entire bogus industry has been built on this non-problem. Geniuses invented the alphabet to make memorizing words easier. What kind of people would discard this great advance?

Also see “30: The War Against Reading” on Improve-Education.org.

Helping the non-reader, the dyslexic, the illiterate

Bruce Price — Thu, 01 May 2008 00:15:17 +0000

Please, if you know a non-reader or you are connected to a literacy program, check out what I believe is a very important new article: 33: How To Help A Non-Reader To Read, on Improve-Education.org. The country is said to have 50,000,000 “functional illiterates.” Typically, these are people once trapped in Whole Word classrooms. They mange to memorize 1,000 or 2,000 “sight words.” But they can’t read phonetically, which is to say, they can’t really read. They can’t read a newspaper. Their academic and employment prospects are limited. In addition, they often suffer from a common side-effect of Whole Word—that is, dyslexia. Have you ever tried to rub your stomach and pat your head at the same time? Your brain is divided against itself. There’s confusion and anxiety. In the case of dyslexia, the brain has two strategies when it encounters a word: pull up its meaning from memory; OR sound it out.

Public schools are pushing Dolch Words at kids as young as 4 and 5. Once the child learns the strategy of treating words as graphic objects to be memorized by their shapes, that child is basically finished as a fluent reader. Sure, the smarter kids will find their way back to phonics in time; they will see the sounds inside the Sight Words. But the slower, less verbal kids are not that flexible. They try to do what they are told—guess, use context, memorize shapes, don’t sound out. Their reward is a reading disability.The whole thing seems like a sick joke….until you glance back at that number 50,0000,000. Our educators have been busy, haven’t they? This new article provides quick diagnostics for assessing the damage. The idea is that a good reader will guide a poor reader through the article, and together they will begin a journey of discovery and recovery. 33: How To Help A Non-Reader To Read.

Why We Need A “Teacher Liberation Front”

Bruce Price — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:41:01 +0000

I just reviewed an old book for Amazon.com called “The New Illiterates” by Samuel Blumenfeld. Published in 1973, this book is still amazingly fresh. How can that be? Because our elite educators still hang on to all their excuses and sophistries, still refuse to work for genuine academic improvement.

In this book Blumenfeld points out that the locus of our problem is “the teachers of teachers,” the ideologues, that is, who run the ed schools. What has changed in 35 years??

More and more I suspect that progress will come from radicalized teachers. To promote this idea, I’ve just added “31: Teacher Liberation Front” to Improve-Education.org. The starting point for this article is a quote in a new book titled “The Great Reading Disaster” by Mona McNee and Alice Coleman. Writing about the UK experience, they state:

“The real villains were not the victimized teachers who carried out the intellectual child abuse but the training establishments that brainwashed them into doing so.”

I urge teachers to savor every word in that quote…Victimized…Brainwashed…”Training establishments” are, of course, the ed schools in England.

As you’ll see in the next post, my site Improve-Education.org says that Jay Leno is Educator of the Year, that Leno is doing more than anyone else to showcase the failures of our public schools. Isn’t it significant that our educators have managed to make Jay Leno, a stand-up comic, appear to be a major intellectual force? (See video in next post for more analysis.)
Should I apologize for being so tough on educators (i.e., the managers at the top)? I feel they’ve earned it. I’ve been studying this field for many years, and let me tell you, it’s like walking through some bizarre lab. The goal seems to be to create unintelligent life forms. Start with Whole Word, so that most kids cannot become fluent readers. Move on to Fuzzy Math, so they can’t count. Filter out all facts from the real world, the scientific world, the historical world, the scholarly world, the industrial world…
Really, I’d like to suggest that, for teachers, the most radical thing you can do is TEACH MORE. That’s the theme of Teacher Liberation Front. Join today.

My Educational Videos on YouTube.com

Bruce Price — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:42:27 +0000

New software lets me create some very useful videos (actually they’re more like animated slideshows). Here are some of the titles you can find on YouTube:

Phonics vs. Whole Word

The Truth About Robots

John Dewey and the Burden of Ideology

How To Teach Latin, Etc.

World’s Easiest Test

Total is now about 20. Enter any of these phrases in their search window. Once you find one, you’ve found them all! Many of the themes discussed in my posts on this blog are dealt with in these videos. The longest is less than 7 minutes.

The Big Silence—How Phonics Was Disappeared

Bruce Price — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:19:58 +0000

As I’ve written about the reading wars—Whole Word vs. phonics—and argued that Whole Word was never anything but a sophistry, I’ve become increasingly fascinated by a collateral question: how were our educators able to get away with their scam?? (If that sounds harsh, please Google: “A Tribute to Rudolph Flesch,” which is on Improve-Education.org.)

Here’s the answer that is haunting me. Whole Word could be pushed upon the country, and phonics driven out of the schools, because our media and academics stood silently by and let it happen.

Remember, Flesch wrote his first Johnny-can’t-read book all the way back in 1955. Everything you need to know is in the first chapter. But educators mobilized against him. Who came to his defense? The media, who should be reporting the truth and the news? NO, not that I can discover. Academics, who should be protecting standards and literacy? NO, not that I can discover. A shameful silence spread across the land.

Please, if you know of examples where media or academics did rally to Flesch’s side, I’d like to know. Any year, any publication, any college. Leave a comment.

The Emerging Era of Ergonomic Education

Bruce Price — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:14:33 +0000

****announcing an important new article****

Here’s a summary of my school years: all my schools were highly-rated, but not one class was taught as well as it could have been. Why?! I’ve been totally intrigued by this question for a long time.

Here’s my suggestion: we need to look at classrooms the way an engineer looks at problems. How, in short, do we teach the most info in the fastest time with the least effort? That’s the ergonomic question.

I’ve finally condensed all my notes into an article titled “How to Teach History, Etc.” (#26 on Improve-Education.org). Here’s the main points:

1. School and teacher must commit to subject.
2. Use every teaching aid, every trick or technique that will make classes more memorable and effective.
3. Repeat, repeat, repeat. And then say it again some other way.
4. Every course is ideally a gigantic mnemonic device, a cluster of interconnected facts, a mind molecule, a matrix.

If you search “ergonomic teaching” or “ergonomic education” in Google, virtually everything you find will deal with the physical world–chairs, lighting and computer screens. That’s physical ergonomics….The educational establishment has been ruinously sidetracked by a second kind–social engineering…. My own fascination is with the third kind: intellectual engineering. The Greeks and Romans were equally fascinated. You’d think all my ideas would be old hat. In fact, it seems that nobody is bothering with this vital frontier. Well, surely somebody must be! But until I know for sure I’m dubbing myself the Father of Ergonomic Education, and inviting all of you to join me in a crusade to make our schools more efficient.

“Why Our Public Schools Do A Poor Job”

Bruce Price — Wed, 23 May 2007 18:58:04 +0000

Goods News! Princeton Alumni Weekly ran my letter–the one below. My faith in Princeton is partially restored. I think it’s a smart letter, and written in a fairly low key. So why not run it? Well, I’ve noticed more and more how the liberal media help the educators by the simple device of standing silently aside. Enough silence. We will not fix the problems in the schools until more people say, “Hey, you know what, these problems did NOT fall down out of the sky. So-called educators did the dirty work. Now, those same people can fix the problems–not likely–or they can get out of the way and let a new generation of real educators improve education.” Here’s the letter:
————————————————————-

“I want to compliment Norman Augustine ‘57 *59 for his article on American education and productivity. I agree with all his points. So, why are we having these problems?

This article echoes many of the points made in the famous 1983 report titled “A Nation at Risk.” No progress in almost 25 years? Can that be by accident?

Antonio Gramsci, a Communist theoretician, said that if you wish to help poor children, make sure they got a good basic education. Unfortunately, our ed establishment became enamoured with an ideology that emphasizes social engineering over learning and literacy.

There’s a hundred policies and promises I could point to. But the emblematic program for the 20th century will always, I believe, be Whole Word (sight reading). Said to be the best way to teach reading, it is in fact unworkable. Let’s do the numbers. The goal ls that children will memorize 800 words each year, which evidently guarantees semi-literacy through high school. Futhermore, only people with exceptional memories can memorize 10,000 of anything–faces, phone numbers, antiques, houses, or sight-words. But you really need to memorize 25,000 or even 50,000 sight-words to be literate in English (which has a huge vocabulary).

The more you study Whole Word, the more you’ll probably conclude with me it was never anything but a sophistry. I find it especially troubling that the media and academia appear to have stood aside and let educators have their way.

I say it’s time for an Education Revolution (I have a blog by that name). The first step might be to politely suggest that our top educators are not likely to fix problems they have created.

We need lots of new ideas and new blood–people from the arts, business, the military, and the professions. Put Norman Augustine and Bill Gates in charge of the schools. Ah, there would be a fine start.”

Bruce Deitrick Price
Norfolk, Va.
Improve-Education.org

—
—
NOTE: Bruce Price’s EDUCATON REVOLUTION (just Google those 4 words) is on Squidoo.com